patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Former Social Security Office May Be Used For Homeless Assistance

However, there is a chance the building could be sold for other uses.

 

 

A federally owned building that has remained vacant for nearly a year could become an outreach center to help the homeless in the coming months. 

The building that formally housed the Montclair Social Security Office, located at 396 Bloomfield Ave., has been determined to be “surplus” property by the federal government on Jan. 18, according to a letter received by the township from the U.S. General Services Administration. 

The fate of the office building will now be in the hands of the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, who has determined the property is suitable for providing assistance to the homeless. 

The property is available to any “public bodies and eligible nonprofit organizations” who wish to use the building to provide assistance to the homeless, according to a letter received by the township from the Department of Health and Human Services.  

Township attorney Ira Karasick noted at Tuesday’s council meeting that the building may be used to provide a variety of different services with regards to helping the homeless. 

“The assistance to homeless people ... can be sheltering, can be feeding, can be other kinds of services,” said Karasick. “It doesn’t mean a shelter necessarily.”

However, there is a chance the building could be sold for other uses. 

Those interested in using the former Social Security Office as a homeless shelter have 60 days from Jan. 18 to apply. If no applications are received or proposals approved within that time, the property will be offered for sale “according to its highest and best use,” according to the government letter to the township.

“If a bona fide, genuine homeless use comes up, the federal government will evaluate it and might select it,” said Karasick. “If there is no homeless use [application submitted or approved], then the property is released basically, ... not sale to be to the public but negotiated sale to government entities like [Montclair Township].”

Karasick was unable to determine how much the property would be sold for if the township chose to purchase it.

  • Do you think the former Social Security Office should be used for homeless assistance?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        3 (27%)
    • No
        8 (72%)
    • Answer not here? Let us know in the comment section below!
        0 (0%)
    Total votes: 11
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Homeless Shelter and Montclair

Carl Ben Witzig

7:56 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Prime commercial locations should not wisely be the place for social services, as a basic rule of "the best use" of available space. Just how many homeless people are within Montclair? How does one prove eligible homelessness? Where are other facilities, to judge whether there is a need in any location? But, just like the Wildwood lot, the owner can do what it likes with the assest I suppose.

Reply

I'd-Rather-Be-at-63

8:32 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

This is a good opportunity for a consortium of those working to support Montclair's homeless to come together and put together a proposal for federal support to assist some of the most needy in our town. Carl Ben Witzig's concern about "best uses" of commercial locations is valid. But Bloomfield Avenue has many vacant commercial spaces even better situated that could be used for commercial development. We need this opportunity to care for the homeless.

Reply

Carl Ben Witzig

10:23 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

A Homeless center could be installed in the police station building, Valley and Bloomfield Ave. But is that the best use of that space? The SS building being owned by US government, does not pay local taxes... school, municipal, county. Deeding it to a non-profit organization for restricted use (homeless center only) or to the town for qualified uses, apparently would leave it off the tax rolls. But to opinionate well we should know the homeless need. How many do we have now? I agree, if needed, it might be a good deal. If not needed, it would be a lost opportunity or even a shame.

Reply

emiliac

11:51 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Shortly after deinstitutionalization laws went into effect in the seventies I was in graduate school on Long Island. My supervised field placement was in the dept of social services in Bayshore under whose auspices services to the homeless fell. The town of Bayshore Long Island became very close to the equivalent of a 'Bowery' (haven for vangrant persons, predominantly males) due to the number of homeless social service recipients on the area of the agency.

Granted, many of that population were recently discharged from Pilgram State and Central Islip pych faciities. But the fact remains that it is not unusual for service recipients with few options of where to go tend to linger in close proximity to the angencies and facilities they rely upon.

I hope that in going forward with this proposal the impact the clientele might have on local businesses will be taken into account. In addition, I wonder if consideration has been given to the construction of a combined municipal/police head quarters at that site!.

Reply

emiliac

12:19 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

After thought:
Homeless people particularly homeless families with children are not criminals and services provided to them must be provided with compassion and dignity in a appropriate hopefully warm setting not unlike the salvation arm facility in town and in churches. Many persons who become homeless say, during a recession or during an economic depression develop emotional issues and should not be around persons carrying weapons.

I say the following with the utmost respect and sensitivity that I can muster:
Let's see, some of us would have adults armed with weapons in our schools. Quite possibly a good number of us would welcome police stations providing services for the homeless. In a society such as that who would patrol the streets? Senior citizens I presume, after all we are home days any way!

Reply
Comment_arrow

esther

1:31 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

I am appalled. Are you saying, emiliac, that homeless people all carry weapons? How about you starting with compassion and dignity? Many homeless people are victims of circumstance- many many people, yes even in peaceful, harmonious, picture-perfect Montclair live one paycheck away from homelessness. Many homeless people belong to single parent families. I don't even understand your comments in the last paragraph. You may have mustered the utmost respect you could but it didn't make sense. I think a facility that provides shelter, food, career counseling, battered spouse support, and tutoring for children is a great idea. The social security building could be redone to do all of these things. It's on a bus line for transportation to jobs, near stores and businesses for job opportunities, is handicapped accesible, has nearby parking, among other things. Mostly both your posts bothered me not simply because of the content but because your comments made no sense at all. And by the way a permanent homeless facility could/should include security as part of their personnel. Additionally homeless facilities ban weapons and drugs and if caught the people are not allowed to stay. Homeless people are still going to be in Montclair, wouldn't a well-run facility be a bonus? I think so.

Rhoda Kriesel

3:10 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Why not develop this building into a use that would bring a lot of positive traffic to this part of Bloomfield Avenue, a section that is struggling with empty storefronts, low-grade stores that need to be updated, and a need to bring more traffic to the retail establishments already in place. Would this be accomplished as a facility for the homeless? I don't think so. And I think there are other locations for a homeless facility that would work better.

Reply

Rhoda Kriesel

3:12 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Future use choice for this facility is very important in the economic development plans of Bloomfield Center. We must review all feasible options and plan carefully. That way, it can become a real asset to the community.

Reply

Townie

5:55 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

This is the only one-story block along the avenue. I say knock it down, along with the adjacent tire store and construct a 4-5 story building. If the township wants to use this specific property to help homeless families with Montclair roots, then I'd suggest it permit an additional floor, over and above whatever a would-be developer might seek, and seek the build-out of some permanent apartments for now-homeless families.

Also in reply to Rhonda Kriesel, this is not the section of Bloomfield Ave particularly struggling with empty storefronts. That's a block up, from Fullerton to Park, courtesy of Mr. Grabowsky. A vibrant and diverse town like Montclair needs "low grade" stores and the fact they they are there, paying rent, suggests local demand.

Reply
Comment_arrow

frank rubacky

7:50 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Townie, I'm not making this personal. Your plan is certainly the logical, traditional development scenario for a typical lot along the Avenue under the new zoning being proposed. It will be a revenue boost. It may contribute architecturally, but I just hope it doesn't detract. BTW, I liked the old Goodyear tire store.
Anyway, my point is 2-fold:
- this US Gov't lot offers an opportunity that similar, privately held lots do not. And none of the remaining Federal properties offer what this does.
- this development scenario is exactly why we do not have an vision-oriented Master Plan. We have no idea how to transition from a township to the city we aspire to be, much less a vibrant one. We just keep chanting "mixed-use" and "smart growth".
I guess we are aspiring to Midtown.

lowell

6:44 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Unfortunately it is not glamorous to support the homeless or poverty in Montclair. Yes, I mean our neighbors. It's glamorous to have fundraisers for Haiti. A night of music and community service hours with a few promoters basking in the glory. How much was raised for Haiti? While we ignore poverty in Montclair. It's a travesty and we are teaching our kids the lesson that our neighbors bring down our house values but Haiti brings community service hours and college application gold stars.

Reply

emiliac

8:55 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Esther, I am appalled that you totally misunderstood what I have written. Au contraire my friend, our sentiment is the same.
In response to someone's comment that a Homeless center could be installed in the police station building, I wrote the opposite of what you seem to understand I wrote. My statement was:
. . . Homeless people particularly homeless families with children are not criminals and services provided to them must be provided with compassion and dignity in an appropriate hopefully warm setting . . .
I have reread and reread my statement, I did no mention the homeless carrying guns. So sad you misread/misunderstood my comment. But, it's not about me. The homeless DO NOT BELONG WITHIN A POLICE STATION. I think on that we agree.
Lowell, yes you are right, that was a kicking fundraiser at the UUCM last nite. We Americans were very active in bringing an end to apartheid in So. Africa and some of us are indifferent to Stop and Frisk of minorities in our cities.

Reply

I'd-Rather-Be-at-63

9:32 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

emiliac, I too was appalled at how Esther misinterpreted you. People should take the time to read more carefully before attacking others here.

I also fully support you on how wrong the Stop and Frisk behavior of law enforcement people with minories is. Those of us with minories in our families can very much appreciate how wrong this is.

Regarding South Africa, yes some of us were appalled by apartheid, just as seeing it going on in other places in the world today. But to think that the US government assisted in the undoing of apartheid is really a bit of an insult to the people of South Africa who suffered and died for their freedom. Despite the rhetoric of sanctions, the US government and industries continued to support the South African government until change became a fact. Let's be honest about our own role in the suffering of others and the dishing out of congratulations.

Reply

lowell

10:27 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

The 4th Annual Concert for Haiti is a full fledged corporate fundraiser organized by residents of Montclair - http://edeyo.org/news-photos
It would be fantastic to fundraise for our local Montclair foundations with the same spirit of fundraising and community service as Edeyo. Lets share some of the glamour, music, community service and public relations right here at home with our neighbors in need.
MNDC - https://montclairmndc.org/
Homecorp - http://www.homecorp.org/

Reply

scarletxknight

10:47 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

emiliac - i think this line......
"I hope that in going forward with this proposal the impact the clientele might have on local businesses will be taken into account"
is what rubbed that person wrong and it rubbed me wrong a bit as well. im not sure where all the weapons talk came from but moving right along.....

i think its a great idea as i have interned at a homeless shelter IN montclair. many residents have no idea just how many of their neighbors are one step away from being homeless or one step from just getting back from that reality. they dont realize how many kids in the schools are from shelters nor do they realize how absurd that stereotypical image is in comparison to who individuals and families experiencing homelessness really are.

Reply

Melissa

3:59 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

For the record, the lovely gentleman from Haiti who started the Edeyo foundation is a beloved Montclair resident who began a school there many years ago. The fundraisers designed for this unique school which provides an education to those childre who would otherwise be uneducated are not a designer fundraisers at all but are a tribute to an organization and a local family with roots in our town as well as Haiti. Our homeless in Montclair are actually far better off than any of the families living in Haiti.
That being said, I couldn't agree more that we all should be doing more locally. Last night MESH served 27 warm meals to homeless in Montclair at the presbyterian church on Groce Street and Tuxedo. those same families (yes there were children) were then going to be transported to a different church to sleep. Also there was a Human Needs Food pantry fundraiser at the home of a family here in Montclair this weekend as well and please let's not forget how many residents work at Toni's kitchen frequently, too. My point is please don't disparage a fundraiser for a good cause, and let's celebrate the local things we do well for our residents and encourage more folks to get involved more frequently.

Reply

Melissa

4:03 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

And, yes, I agree that we should use the SS office to aid those in need. Obviously there were at least 27 men, women and children in need of a warm place to stay on a very cold night last night.

Reply

lowell

6:29 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Yes - little tiny fundraisers all over Montclair. Lets be serious about our town here. When will there be a full blown fundraiser ala Annual Haiti for our neighbors. If you look at the financials for Edeyo (posted on the website) they have a lot of support. Please don't be blind to the fact that a fundraiser for Haiti is more glamorous and gets better Public Relations than a fundraiser for our neighbors. Sorry, I don't think we take a good enough look at how many of our neighbors live or how many live in and out of shelters. It is a travesty !!

Reply

Melissa

7:56 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Lowell the human needs fundraiser wasn't tiny, it had a matching grant of up to 30k and Edeyo has a partner in NYC who is a famous nightclub owner so Much of their money also comes from celebrities, But it has taken them a long time and a lot of hard work for them to raise that money and I might remind you that there was a catastrophic earthquake during that time as well. Instead of begrudging them, I challenge you to plan a fundraiser for our local charities and lead the cause. I think you'd get a pleasant surprise how many in town would come out to support.

Reply

lowell

9:50 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Melissa, I don't live in town I'm just passing through. I can't afford to live here. I am a child care provider. I challenge the Edeyo committee and sponsors to plan a fundraiser for our local charities. They would do a great job. Yes I know there was a massive earthquake in Haiti, but I see close up the poverty in Montclair. Do you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

mtc parent

2:50 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Lowell, if you're just passing through, you may not realize how many local charities there are that are supported by Montclair residents. Here's one coming up--for Toni's Kitchen, a soup kitchen at St. Luke's Church on S. Fullerton that serves the homeless from Montclair and surrounding communities. For anyone who would like to attend or donate, here's the information: http://tk.slechurch.org/?p=415.
https://www.facebook.com/#!/tonis.kitchen?fref=ts

Rhoda Kriesel

12:28 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

You know, it seems the homeless includes every age: young children, teenagers, parents, empty nesters as well as seniors. This center should serve them all, and be a focus point for assistance, education, cultural events, etc. A full scope of life needs. That would be great. Please note that HUD requires it to be a 501 (c)3 that takes over the property - by definition, not for profit, but making a contribution to the economy of Montclair

Reply

ODLAW

8:29 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

I dont think it would be a good idea putting a homeless shelter in an area that gets a lot of business from visiors thus contributing to the tax rolls. It would seem out of place putting a homeless shelther in an area that includes the Wellmont and other nice restaurants. It would probably be better putting it in the more blighted areas of montclair.

Reply

Leave a comment